The Sovereignty of Law（ISBN=9780521703857） 下载 网盘 kindle mobi 115盘 pdf pdb rtf

Recently, the role of courts has changed dramatically. Not only do courts now have to decide cases between parties, they also often have to choose between competing fundamental values. Judges may have to balance the potentially conflicting interests of human life and human dignity; freedom of speech and the right of privacy; or free trade and the protection of the environment. The courts may have to circumscribe freedom of religion, and decide when religious dress may be worn. With the non-specialist in mind, and starting from the basic notion of the rule of law, this book explores how judges can and should address such issues. Both the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Union often play a decisive role, and the book points out both the advantages and the difficulties posed by this. Above all, it seeks to promote a more informed debate.

The Hamlyn Trust 

The Hamlyn Lectures

Preface 

1 Introduction

2 The rule of law in Europe

3 The European Convention on Human Rights and therule of

law 

4 The European Union and the rule of law 

5 Fundamental values

6 Courts and free markets 

7 The European Union today: some achievements 

8 The European Union today: some problems 

Afterword

Index

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：The Sovereignty of Law（ISBN=9780521703857）在线阅读

在线听书地址：The Sovereignty of Law（ISBN=9780521703857）在线收听

在线购买地址：The Sovereignty of Law（ISBN=9780521703857）在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

Recently, the role of courts has changed dramatically. Not only do courts now have to decide cases between parties, they also often have to choose between competing fundamental values. Judges may have to balance the potentially conflicting interests of human life and human dignity; freedom of speech and the right of privacy; or free trade and the protection of the environment. The courts may have to circumscribe freedom of religion, and decide when religious dress may be worn. With the non-specialist in mind, and starting from the basic notion of the rule of law, this book explores how judges can and should address such issues. Both the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Union often play a decisive role, and the book points out both the advantages and the difficulties posed by this. Above all, it seeks to promote a more informed debate.