Queenship and Political Discourse in The Elizabethan Realms(ISBN=9780521819220) 下载 网盘 kindle mobi 115盘 pdf pdb rtf

　　This book re-evaluates the nature of Elizabethan politics and

Elizabeth's queenship in late sixteenth-century England, Wales and

Ireland. Natalie Mears shows that Elizabeth took an active role in

policy-making and suggests that Elizabethan politics has to be

perceived in terms of personal relations between the queen and her

advisers rather than of the hegemony of the privy council. She

challenges current perceptions of political debate at court as

restricted and integrates recent research on court drama and

religious ritual into the wider context of political debate.

Finally, providing a survey of the nature of political debate

outside the court, Dr Mears challenges seminal work by Jürgen

Habermas, as well as of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century

historians, by showing that a 'public sphere' existed in late

sixteenth-century England, Wales and Ireland. In doing so, she

re-evaluates how sociologists and historians have, and should,

conceptualize the 'public sphere'.

1. Elizabethan court politics and the public sphere

2. Elizabeth I and the politics of intimacy

3. Gender and consultation

4. News and political debate at the Elizabethan court

5. The circulation of news in the Elizabethan realms

6. The Elizabethan public sphere

7. Perceptions of Elizabeth and her queenship in public

discourse

Conclusion

Select bibliography

Index.

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Queenship and Political Discourse in The Elizabethan Realms(ISBN=9780521819220)在线阅读

在线听书地址：Queenship and Political Discourse in The Elizabethan Realms(ISBN=9780521819220)在线收听

在线购买地址：Queenship and Political Discourse in The Elizabethan Realms(ISBN=9780521819220)在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

This book re-evaluates the nature of Elizabethan politics and Elizabeth's queenship in late sixteenth-century England, Wales and Ireland. Natalie Mears shows that Elizabeth took an active role in policy-making and suggests that Elizabethan politics has to be perceived in terms of personal relations between the queen and her advisors rather than of the hegemony of the privy council. She challenges current perceptions of political debate at court as restricted and integrates recent research on court drama and religious ritual into the wider context of political debate.