Satisficing and Maximizing(ISBN=9780521010054) 下载 网盘 kindle mobi 115盘 pdf pdb rtf

暂无相关简介，正在全力查找中！

Introduction Michael Byron

1. Two views of satisficing Michael Slote

2. Satisficing as a humanly rational strategy David Schmidtz

3. Maxificing: life on a budget or, if you would maximize, then

satisfice Jan Narveson

4. Satisficing and substantive values Thomas Hurka

5. A new defense of satisficing Michael Weber

6. Satisficing: Not good enough Henry S. Richardson

7. Why ethical satisficing makes sense and rational satisficing

doesn't James Dreier

8. The plausibility of satisficing and the role of good in ordinary

thought Mark van Roojen

9. Satisficing and perfectionism in virtue ethics Christine

Swanton

10. Could Aristotle satisfice? Michael Byron

11. How do economists think about rationality? Tyler Cowen.

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Satisficing and Maximizing(ISBN=9780521010054)在线阅读

在线听书地址：Satisficing and Maximizing(ISBN=9780521010054)在线收听

在线购买地址：Satisficing and Maximizing(ISBN=9780521010054)在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

　　How do we think about what we plan to do? One dominant answer

is that we select the best possible option available. However, a

growing number of philosophers would offer a different answer:

since we are not equipped to maximize we often choose the next best

alternative, one that is no more than satisfactory. This strategy

choice is called satisficing (a term coined by the economist Herb

Simon). This collection of essays explores both these accounts of

practical reason, examining the consequences for adopting one or

the other for moral theory in general and the theory of practical

rationality in particular. It aims to address a constituency larger

than contemporary moral philosophers and bring these questions to

the attention of those interested in the applications of decision

theory in economics, psychology and political science.

　　? Explores two competing views of practical rationality ?

Inter-disciplinary appeal to economics, psychology and political

science