Pericles, Prince of Tyre（ISBN=9780521297103） 下载 网盘 kindle mobi 115盘 pdf pdb rtf

Over the last two decades there has been a resurgence of theatrical interest in Shakespeare's Pericles, which has been rescued from comparative neglect and is now frequently performed. This development is charted in the introduction to this edition, which differs radically from any other currently available. Doreen DelVecchio and Antony Hammond reject the current orthodoxies that the text is seriously corrupt and that the play is of divided authorship. They show how the 1609 quarto has features in common with the first quarto of King Lear, now widely regarded as being based on Shakespeare's manuscript. Likewise they regard the arguments concerning divided authorship as unproven and misleading. Instead they show the play to be a unified aesthetic experience.

Introduction (date, sources, authorship, performance, the play);

Note on the text; List of characters, The Play: Supplementary

notes; Textual analysis; Supplementary notes; Textual analysis;

Reading list.

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Pericles, Prince of Tyre（ISBN=9780521297103）在线阅读

在线听书地址：Pericles, Prince of Tyre（ISBN=9780521297103）在线收听

在线购买地址：Pericles, Prince of Tyre（ISBN=9780521297103）在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

　　Over the last two decades there has been a resurgence of

theatrical interest in Shakespeare's Pericles, which has been

rescued from comparative neglect and is now frequently performed.

This development is charted in the introduction to this edition,

which differs radically from any other currently available. Doreen

DelVecchio and Antony Hammond reject the current orthodoxies that

the text is seriously corrupt and that the play is of divided

authorship. They show how the 1609 quarto has features in common

with the first quarto of King Lear, now widely regarded as being

based on Shakespeare's manu*. Likewise they regard the

arguments concerning divided authorship as unproven and misleading.

Instead they show the play to be a unified aesthetic

experience.

　　? Pericles has enjoyed a renaissance of interest recently, in

both performance and criticism ? Hammond a very experienced editor

(did the Arden Richard III) ? Editors take a radical view of the

play's textual history and authorship, maintaining that it is the

work of Shakespeare alone ? Arden Pericles not due out until

1999

书籍介绍

Over the last two decades there has been a resurgence of theatrical interest in Shakespeare's Pericles, which has been rescued from comparative neglect and is now frequently performed. This development is charted in the introduction to this edition, which differs radically from any other currently available. Doreen DelVecchio and Antony Hammond reject the current orthodoxies that the text is seriously corrupt and that the play is of divided authorship. They show how the 1609 quarto has features in common with the first quarto of King Lear, now widely regarded as being based on Shakespeare's manuscript. Likewise they regard the arguments concerning divided authorship as unproven and misleading. Instead they show the play to be a unified aesthetic experience.